You can see the stupid Gambit post here.

Mother Jones throws down with David Vitter

Here is my response.

Fist of all is this Journalism?

“Instead of coming up with serious measures to save the economy, the party intends to devote its time to an “we told you so” agenda that will include GOP-only hearings on the bill’s impact in the coming months to highlight the bill’s purportedly wasteful elements and shortcomings.”

Cause it sounds like an opinion. I am a Libertarian so I don't care if the Republicans get their feelings hurt but I saw the president say in his "so called" press conference where he picked the questions in advance that he heard the Republican plans and they were the same old Tax cuts that never work. "We have tried that" he said. So it is not that the Republicans don't have any plans it's that the liberals in the press don't like them. And they are providing political cover for the president and the democrats.

The other argument presented by the president is that "he doesn't put a lot of Stock" in complaints about spending from people that historically over spent in the past. I heard Charlie Melancon say the same thing on the Radio 2 days ago.

What difference does that make? If someone has been convicted of a DUI and they tell you as you leave a party that "you had better get a cab because you are drunk" does that mean you should ignore them?

It wouldn't make any difference what plans the republicans came up with unless they involved spending they are not going to have a voice in this. They have been in fact locked out. So yes elections have consequences and spending money you don't have does too. Most people are not paying attention anyway. This is all biased Rot and that is all part of the White house plan in my opinion. It's silly double talk.  If it was wrong to over spend before the collapse it is double wrong now.

When you start out calling someone “Diaper Dave” it's pretty obvious that you are going to make up anything you like anyway. I am very proud of our congressional delegation and I support any fiscal conservatives in any party at this point. If you can't make any changes to the bill and you think it is going to fail then you should make them own it. Just like the Democrats did after they voted for the war. They said over and over the war is a failure and they tried to make the Republicans own that. At least the Republicans are not voting one way and then coming out against something afterwards when it is politically expedient. By the way when the George Bush was wasting money the Democrats voted for all of that too. Accept for funding the war after they figured out that the media was going to cover for them.

It was a nice touch to find a way to bring up the prostitution thing again. Saying he has a Diaper Fetish as if that is a fact is really a low blow but maybe you guys think that has something to do with the question about the so called "stimulus package".

I guess in your way of thinking we should let Larry Flint determine who our representatives are in congress because he paid a lot of money to get Vitter on the prostitution thing and he also KO Bob Livingston and you the Gambit didn't do anything accept echo every charge and personal character assination. As a Libertarian I don't care if he likes 3 ways with Tran-Sexuals. That doesn't make him incorrect about the stimulus package and if he was a democrat that would be a resume enhancer like not paying his taxes. You’re like Sheeple herders with the magazine.

< Prev		Next >