Tuesday Feb 07
killdozer.jpg

Global Warming

Written by The Resista Tuesday, 30 May 2006 07:35
Attention: open in a new window. PDFPrintE-mail
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Fifty years of industrialization and economic development have had severe consequences on China's environment. China's rush into industrialisation after 1950 was undertaken with hardly any regard for the atmosphere, water supplies, forests or the countryside in general. Belching smokestacks were seen as proof of the success of socialist construction. Severe environmental pollution, including acid rain, thick smog, toxic waste, water pollution, and rapidly growing emissions of carbon dioxide, has been the result. 

 

I have heard the nashing of teeth over the coming Chinese dominance since the eighties. I have tried to tell people to have confidence in capitalism and don’t give in to the negative thinking that is so often the hallmark of our press corps and the legions of soothsayers and pundits.

 

The fact is the communist system is restrictive and does not allow dissent. So when you have a major abuse of government power or the abuse by a corporation of  trust of the masses then you don’t get any relief under that system.  Nothing happens except the dissenters go to jail and the people get abused. And so it goes in China today.

 

The advantage of Capitalism is that it does not concentrate all of the power into the hands of government so really the free market rules. It may take longer then we would like but when people find out about pollution  they start raising hell.  

 

I know we have had some famous exceptions to this case and once again if you sound off and some how you come up missing and are never seen again, like Karen Silkwood, then you get killed all right but that is not the end of that story and now they make a move and a book about you all of which serves to bring down the corporate giant a civil action is filed and the whole thing unravels. A superfund site is developed from the fines. The bottom line is no matter how far someone wants to take a cover up it eventually effects the publicly held companies bottom line and the bull shit comes to an end.

 

Image
Win honor for our great leader Chairman Mao, bring credit to our great socialist motherland, 1970
So these are the types of reforms that are possible in an open system. They take too long and some people die but the truth comes out. Even in the case of collusion between government and private industry there is the chance that the pollution  and the source will stop for the public good and the economic viability of the area of concern. In this country no one has the right to destroy your ability to make money in your own community and pollution can end a communities chances and sometimes these communities can’t ever come back.   

 

In a closed system like China this is not possible. The government can not be questioned and the industry that is owned by the government. Has polluted the environment in ways that extend far beyond the local community. The same things happened here in Lake Ponchatrain and in the Mississippi river as well. It was dealt with by citizens groups that put pressure on the local government and industry. Laws were changed people that were in certain industries suffered, but it was dealt with decades ago and now is much better. Not so in China and they have taken it to the level where this river may be ruined forever and there are many such environmental tragedies waiting to be revealed.

 

Here is the dirty truth and you have to wonder how come the environmentalists are not down the Chinese government’s throat.  Oh I remember why now it’s because they don’t really care and they are closet commies themselves. How could I have forgotten?

 Here is the sad sad story.


Read more: Bloated Commie government can't clean up it's act.

 
Written by The Resista Monday, 22 May 2006 14:39
Attention: open in a new window. PDFPrintE-mail
User Rating: / 2
PoorBest 
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

 

Drudge has this flashback on his site. It just shows you how very wastful this chowderhead is. His carbon footprint is as big as half the city I live in.  

 

 

"The most vulnerable part of the Earth's environment is the very thin layer
of air clinging near to the surface of the planet, that we are now so

carelessly filling with gaseous wastes that we are actually altering the
relationship between the Earth and the Sun - by trapping more solar
radiation under this growing blanket of pollution that envelops the entire
world," Vice President Gore told the U.N. Global Warming conference of 159
nations this morning in Koyto, Japan.

In what was one the most dramatic speeches in recent memory, Gore announced
to world leaders: "Whether we recognize it or not, we are now engaged in an
epic battle to right the balance of our Earth, and the tide of this battle
will turn on when the majority of people in the world become sufficiently
aroused by shared sense of urgent danger to join an all-out effort."

Applause filed the halls of the Kyoto International Conference Center. "We
must achieve a safe overall concentration level for greenhouse gases in the
Earth's atmosphere."

carbondioxidemethanenitrousoxidehydrofluorocarbonsperfluorocarbonssulfurhexa
chloride.

The message is serious. So serious in fact, the DRUDGE REPORT has
calculated that Vice President Al Gore is burning more than 439,500 pounds
of fuel, or 65,600 gallons, at a cost of more than $131,000 on his 16,000
mile daytrip, just to deliver the warning.

Now that's commitment.

Air Force II's Global Warming Express features an itinerary that takes the
vice president from Washington to Florida to Washington to Alaska to Japan
and back -- all in just 72-hours.

 

 

 

"The extra heat which cannot escape is beginning to change the global
patterns of climate to which we are accustomed. Our fundamental challenge
now is to find out whether and how we can change the behaviors that are
causing the problem."

Gore's plane, a Boeing 707 gas guzzler burns on average 4.1 gallons a mile.
The complete Washington to Florida to Washington to Alaska to Japan and
return to Washington trip calculated from commercial air mileage tables is
just over 16,000 miles total. Gas gallons needed for AIR FORCE II to go
16,000 miles: 65,600. Applying the average price of $2.01 per gallon of
Jet A to the 16,000 mile r/t -- the fuel cost alone passes $131,000.00.
There are 6.7 pounds per gallon of jet fuel. Total pounds of fuel burned on
Gore's Global Warming Express -- 439,500.

Unprecedented Leadership.

Written by The Resista Wednesday, 10 May 2006 07:13
Attention: open in a new window. PDFPrintE-mail
AddThis Social Bookmark Button
A hurricane with only moderate intensity could wreak havoc in New York City because it has been years since the nation's financial center faced severe weather, government forecasters warned on Tuesday.

"The first time we get hit here with a Category 2, it's going to be disastrous," said meteorologist Michael Wyllie of the National Weather Service, referring to the scale used to rate hurricane strength.

Wyllie said powerful storms have missed New York in recent years, unlike parts of the Gulf Coast, where periodic storms "thin out the trees and the buildings."

 

Gloria, the last big storm to hit the New York area, caused about $900 million in economic losses along the East Coast in 1985, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

"It's not like we can all run down to Home Depot and pick up these two-by-fours to board up windows," said John Koch, lead forecaster at the NWS forecast office in New York. "What we want people to do is know what they are going to do with their family and their pets."

Koch urged residents to familiarize themselves with the location of evacuation zones and make plans to have extra dry clothes, medicines, batteries, water and copies of valuable documents.

Written by The Resista Wednesday, 10 May 2006 07:11
Attention: open in a new window. PDFPrintE-mail
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

 U.Va. researcher says temperature isn't only factor for hurricanes

 

Global warming by itself cannot be blamed for the increase in severe Atlantic hurricanes, University of Virginia climate researchers report.

"It is too simplistic to only implicate sea-surface temperatures in the dramatic increase in the number of major hurricanes," said the study's lead author, Patrick J. Michaels.

Warm water fuels tropical cyclones. Some hurricane researchers have related warming in the Atlantic basin with greater hurricane severity, pointing to greenhouse-induced atmosphere warming as the cause for the ocean heating.

But hurricanes' ultimate strength is not directly linked to the underlying water temperatures, the Virginia scientists said.

"There are more severe hurricanes appearing than are explainable by the rise in sea-surface temperatures since the 1990s," said Michaels, a professor of environmental sciences and director of the Virginia Climatology Office.

Michaels is a leading skeptic of global warming's potential harm.

To fire off monster hurricanes of Category 3 or stronger, the brewing storm has to move over water with a temperature of at least 83 degrees.

Areas where the water is regularly hotter, such as the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea, won't see more intense storms than in the past, Michaels said.

"At that point, other factors take over," he said, "such as the vertical wind profile, and atmospheric temperature and moisture gradients."

The U.Va. climatologists found that increasing water temperatures account for only about half of the increase in strong hurricanes over the past 25 years.

"We should have had 28 Category 3 storms from the warming" between 1995 and 2005, Michaels said. "Instead we had 42." By comparison, 16 such storms developed between 1982 and 1994.

Michaels believes the increase in hurricane activity beginning in the 1990s is related mainly to variation in the North Atlantic's temperature patterns, not temperature change itself.

"The pattern can appear whether it's cool or whether it's warm," he said.

While expanding the 83-degree zone ought to produce more severe hurricanes, Michaels said, that expansion would also place the storms farther north in the Atlantic, "where there are very few things to hit."

"In the future we may expect to see more major hurricanes," Michaels said, "but we don't expect the ones that do form to be any stronger than the ones that we have seen in the past."

The Virginia study looked at the water temperatures along the paths of the 205 Atlantic tropical cyclones since 1982, providing a more precise picture of the tropical environment involved in each hurricane's development.

The study will appear today in the journal Geophysical Research Letters.

Michaels did the report with U.Va. environmental science professor Robert E. Davis and Paul C. Knappenberger, a former graduate student in environmental sciences at Virginia.

 

Written by The Resista Tuesday, 25 April 2006 03:02
Attention: open in a new window. PDFPrintE-mail
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Link to full article on Wired 

 

You don't change the world by hiding in the woods, wearinga hair shirt, or buying indulgences in the form of save the earth bumper stickers. You do it by articulating a vision for the future and pursuing it with all the ingenuity humanity can muster. Indeed, being green at the start of the 21st century requires a wholehearted commitment to upgrading civilization. Four key principles can guide the way:


Read more: Change the World Mr. Hippie? Start with your self

Page 2 of 3